Archives for posts with tag: Recruitment

Donna Grubb

Donna Grubb is currently the head of the Art Gallery of New South Wales’ Human Resources (HR) team. While responsible for ensuring that all people processes run smoothly, one of HR’s key roles is to support the Gallery in recruitment of the best people. The AGNSW is an employer of choice in the arts industry, and while they recruit only 20-30 people a year, they can receive 400 to 500 applications for a position. So the challenge they face is how to identify the employee who can best fit into the organisation from both skill and personality perspective, from a large prospective candidate pool.

Donna spoke to arts interview about the method of selecting the right fit for the organisation, whether there is such a thing as an ‘artistic personality’ and shared a few personal pieces of advice for developing a career in the arts.

Interview by Kim Goodwin

 Are there specific capability or competency types you look for? And do you recruit skills or look to develop them from within?

We have not really gone into competencies as such, as we have a broad range of roles, which are very different. What we look for in a gallery officer will be very different from what we look for in bookshop staff.

When looking at curators or conservators, we are looking for people who can communicate well, who can work well in teams, and those who are able to deal with a high workload. We do find some people that come in as assistant curators and move up, so they get that training ground. This is something we really support.

The Gallery has a lot of interns coming in and they sometimes move into a temporary assistant curator role. Sometimes, however, the gap is too big and we have to recruit externally, for example the Asian art area, where there is not a pool of people in Australia who we can rely on. In those cases we would look to international advertising and recruitment to fill some roles.

So what recruitment process do you use? Do you see value in psychometric testing?

We are just looking at psychometric testing now actually. We have not done it, but we think it could be beneficial, particularly when undertaking the bulk recruitment activity like with gallery officers. We are likely to be moving in this direction in areas where a lot of applicants have similar experience; you really need to be able to tell them apart.

Sometimes the person who comes in on the first day of work seems completely different from the person you have interviewed! It is about ensuring that we get the right people into the organisation.

How does recruiting for a cultural institution differ to corporate recruitment?

I have never worked in a for-profit, but I have worked in a lot of government organisations, and although everyone likes to think they are unique, there are a lot of similarities.

What is different, however, is that the gallery has a great feeling about it. I have been here for 10 years and it is such a lovely place to work. There is great morale and we are really successful. We are an employer of choice. For our corporate jobs a lot of people take pay cuts to work here, because we are an organisation a lot of people want to work for.

Do you think there is an ‘artistic personality’? Do you see any personality themes in your workplace?

Just thinking about our curators, they are all very different. From my point of view, I would not see that there is an artistic personality at all. I would say the organisation is influenced heavily by the temperament and disposition of the person leading it. Edmund Capon is a very strong leader and influences how managers and supervisors interact with staff – treating people with respect and dignity. I have been in other organisations where the CEO has been authoritarian and controlling and that flows through to how the staff treat each other.

What advice could you give to those starting out in the industry to be noticed (in a good way)?

The key comes down to experience; what experience you have. You have to be able to demonstrate that you have the runs on the board, have done particular research, and known in this area, or have worked in the space.

So my advice is do the internships, work in the galleries, volunteer. Get yourself known.

Interested in learning more about employment at the AGNSW:

Information on employment, internships or volunteering for the Gallery can be found via the website under “About Us” and “Employment and Tenders”. The Art Gallery only accepts applications for advertised positions.

Barry Hessenius

This week arts interview talks to someone who has a unique perspective on the arts industry – another blogger. Barry Hessenius, of Barry’s blog, has a readership of around 10,000 arts administrators from the United States and across the globe. Barry discusses what he feels are critical issues facing those in the industry and each week he shares common concerns and discusses ideas, all with an element of humour. In January, Barry posted a piece on job advertisements in the arts that we felt was worth further discussion, so we asked Barry for a moment of his time.

Interview by Kim Goodwin

You say in your post that job advertisements are firstly generic, but secondly unrealistic – in what way are these advertisements unrealistic? Is it not fair to look for well rounded, experienced arts professionals?

It was, of course, meant as tongue-in-cheek satire, so looking for well-rounded and experienced arts professionals is not only fair, but the only rational option. But the advertisements themselves are all the same and on the surface it would appear that the employers are looking for some “perfect” candidate that likely does not exist. Let’s be real – the “ideal” candidate that meets that kind of job description probably already has a job – one paying far more than the one being offered. I think in order to better match qualified candidates to jobs that they would be a good fit for, the descriptions should be a little more honest in what the job is and what the challenges are, and those doing the hiring should be a little more open to the qualifications of candidates in trying to determine who could, in practice, do the job well. I also think that those doing the hiring might at least consider taking a little more risk in terms of whom they ultimately hire and not rely so much on past experience as the only determinant of consideration.

How often would you say that arts organisations “settle” for the best they can get? 

If their expectations are unrealistic and ill thought out – then 95% of the time. What choice is there? There are few really fully developed, spectacular, gifted, visionary, experienced, dynamic, charismatic leaders in any field. That does not mean that the rest of the candidate pool is not qualified, is not competent and is not capable of growing and learning, and developing into true leaders. The point is that what arts organisations should probably be looking for are diamonds in the rough as it were – potentially gifted leaders and managers. And take a little risk on them. I think personal chemistry is not an unimportant criterion to consider. On the other hand, organisations that look for candidates that are a good match in terms of the skill sets the candidates have, as related to the challenges that the organisation faces. Understand that for the most part employment at their organisation is part of a longer and larger career trajectory for the candidates and appreciate that they offer an ecosystem in which rising stars in the field can cut their teeth, gain experience and become outstanding administrators and managers – then those organisations very likely find new hires very close to what they want – and in that sense do not “settle” at all.

Realistically, how many arts organisation recruit primarily through networks and relationships, making the advertisement more an act of compliance rather than a real tool to uncover emerging talent? 

I think that is probably correct. I have no idea about the statistics, but I would suspect that most organisations that hire a search firm, or that advertise widely and prefer national searches, do not get that much larger or better a final candidate pool than they otherwise would have.

Do you think there is value for arts organisations to invest in better human resources or talent management techniques?

Value? Absolutely. The problem is one of cost. The current economic constraints all but prohibit that kind of investment. While it is always challenging to find the right person for a given position, at least in America, it is a buyer’s market at the moment. Supply exceeds demand, with more qualified candidates than positions available.

Retention is a harder challenge for a number of reasons, chief among them that most small to medium sized organisations have limited advancement opportunities for their employees. They have relatively small teams, people in the higher or supervisorial positions do not tend to retire or move on all that frequently, baby boomers are finding that it is more difficult financially for them to retire (and many do not want to anyway), and thus, the openings for the younger cohort of arts administrators are fewer and farther between. That results in lateral advancement, which is not often available either, to other organisations as the only viable option to move up the ladder, or move out of the field altogether – which is a problem for all of us. In several studies, including one I authored on Youth Involvement in the Arts for the Hewlett Foundation, we found that while the inability of arts organisations to pay even a living wage to younger employees was an issue in retention, it was not as important to that cohort as their career trajectory, mentoring opportunities, meaningful work, the chance for early decision making responsibility and to learn on the job, and a convivial working environment.

As to better talent management techniques, I think we have a long way to go. In terms of providing professional development opportunities for our people to enhance their skills and become better administrators or managers, we are woefully inadequate. To the extent we offer any training opportunities, they are extremely limited (e.g. we offer fundraising training, but not such things as “how to be a better listener”). And while there are university degree programs in arts administration, there are too few easily accessible, affordable, on demand training options to the average arts worker.

Interested in further reading on roles and jobs in the arts?